| Hardness |
850–1,200 HV The inherent hardness of the chrome coating, expressed on the Vickers scale. |
1,200–1,800 HV Higher hardness, typical of Cr₂O₃/Al₂O₃ ceramic coatings. |
Greater hardness does not automatically mean a better choice. You need to consider the pressure, impact resistance, bending, and the surface on which the roller operates. |
| Abrasion resistance |
Good wear resistance in many industrial applications, especially where a low coefficient of friction is also important. |
Works very well for uniform abrasion of the work surface, without impacts or excessive localized pressure. |
When wear is even, ceramic may have the advantage. When impacts and localized overloads come into play, you need to be careful. |
| Friction and Slippage |
the strength of chrome A low coefficient of friction helps with sliding motion, material handling, and reducing sticking. |
It can be used in conveying or metering applications, but the choice depends on the medium, surface roughness, and method of contact. |
When it comes to sliding friction, chrome is often a safe choice, especially when the coating is to be reapplied later. |
| Hits |
It withstands shock waves better than ceramic coatings. |
It is hard, but more brittle, so impacts are a significant limitation. |
If impacts, collisions, or foreign objects getting caught between the rollers occur during the process, the ceramic must be carefully evaluated. |
| Point pressure |
It may be more advantageous for localized surface loads, provided that the roller's base has sufficient load-bearing capacity. |
Excessive pressure at a single point increases the risk of cracking or damaging the coating. |
A hard coating alone is not enough if the roller core or geometry cannot withstand the loads. |
| Bending stresses |
It's better to use this direction where the roller is under load and may bend. |
It does not withstand high bending stresses as well due to the brittleness of the coating. |
For long or heavily loaded rollers, it is necessary to evaluate not only the coating but also the stiffness of the entire component. |
| Working with Liquids and Chemicals |
It can operate in demanding environments, but corrosion protection is limited and depends on the condition of the coating. |
It may offer advantages when working with liquids, varnish, paint, or chemical media, provided that the application does not generate impacts or localized pressure. |
This is one of the areas where technical ceramics are often worth examining. |
| Corrosion |
It protects the steel substrate only as long as the coating remains undamaged. Once damaged, the medium can reach the substrate through microcracks. |
It may be advantageous in certain chemically demanding environments, but the choice depends on the medium and the operating conditions. |
It’s not worth treating any coating as unconditional protection. What matters is the whole package: the coating, the substrate, the seal, and how it’s used. |
| Refurbishment |
easier recovery Worn chrome can be removed and reapplied if the condition of the core allows it. |
The restoration or reapplication of a coating requires a case-by-case technical assessment. |
For expensive rollers or those custom-made for a specific machine, the ability to be remanufactured is often a key argument in favor of chrome. |
| Cr(VI) and regulations |
Electrolytic chromium plating is an electroplating process based on chromium compounds. |
Ceramics can reduce dependence on Cr(VI)-based electroplating processes, but only if operating conditions allow for the use of a ceramic coating. |
Environmental or regulatory considerations should not replace a technical analysis of the application. |